From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: [bug] [new exporter] [markdown] Underline exports as HTML Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:54:22 -0600 Message-ID: <87k3pbcn2p.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87txohh7uj.fsf@lapcat.tftorrey.com> <877gldwn74.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130312004205.GA74763@BigDog.local> <877glduknq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871ubjfhxb.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFo0e-0001G7-Ak for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:54:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFo0W-00062Z-2i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:54:32 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]:50304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFo0V-00061S-T1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:54:24 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n15so473947dad.15 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871ubjfhxb.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:17:20 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bastien , Rick Frankel , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Bastien writes: > >> Rick Frankel writes: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:06:55AM +0100, Bastien wrote: >>>> Hi Terry, >>>> >>>> tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) writes: >>>> >>>> > I'm not experienced with markdown, but this doesn't look right to >>>> > me. >>>> >>> >>>> AFAIK there is no syntax for underlining in Markdown, so underlined >>>> text in Org will be exported as plain text in Markdown. >>> >>> I would argue that underlining is a form of emphasis, so the leading >>> and trailing underscores should be passed through verbatim to >>> markdown (which, in markdown syntax is an emphasized span). >> >> Yes, I see your point -- it's now the case. > > AFAIU, one Markdown feature is to accept raw HTML as part of the syntax. > So, what's wrong in writing in HTML code anything that is not directly > supported by Markdown syntax (like tables)? > Pandoc supports tables in markdown documents, maybe this would be a good syntax to target, as with pandoc markdown may be further exported to either HTML or LaTeX. http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/README.html#tables FWIW, it looks like pandoc also supports Org-mode tables. http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/README.html#pipe-tables Just throwing out ideas, I don't personally use the markdown export. Best, -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte