From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Babel] org-babel-execute-buffer gives different results than
 org-babel-exp-non-block-elements
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:11:20 +0200
Message-ID: <87k3jckes7.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CANMKmefCDqs_amf=OXMLuSJw4qm5EE3xy3upuwOAYhsSBQTcxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y57twot4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CANMKmec47Ao3pJDmDM=PEemBVwm6D7X8BPeU77J+kmd6BsbiTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANMKmef1PG27vr1-0BzjZM6uQk5-06PV3+FwwDnuSBYFa6_STA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ppt5wjn1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CANMKmeeQ_y3hFm8MVW2u287FiKGQm8rkFSaYDifZLt8TGVtreg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87siy1jpff.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CANMKmecqCo9SeCrET1-ecv8E5=pk0Rw=M-nWMZViCy437d94Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56774)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VCmSi-0002by-NR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:11:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VCmSa-00045M-4a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:11:16 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]:62801)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VCmSZ-00045F-Uz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:11:08 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q58so240276wes.39
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANMKmecqCo9SeCrET1-ecv8E5=pk0Rw=M-nWMZViCy437d94Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Nicolas Girard's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:20:09 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas@gmail.com> writes:

>> `org-babel-exp-non-block-elements' and `org-babel-exp-process-buffer'
>> could probably check if code still exists before trying to remove (and
>> replace) it.
>>
>
> Yeah, I don't know how much work it would represent but it seems much
> more appropriate that my hack-ish solution.

It might be tricky to set up. I'm not even sure Babel is meant for these
cases (where evaluating code removes its source).

Another possibility is to have a "side-effect only" behaviour for export
where code block is not removed nor replaced. ":exports none" could be
a candidate for this. Maybe Eric Schulte has an opinion on it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou