From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: [ox-odt] "optimal" width of tables Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:13:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2z72vht.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQHAx-0001iW-ID for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:13:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQHAt-00083Z-EF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:13:31 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQHAt-00083R-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:13:27 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQHAs-0005FG-01 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:13:26 +0100 Received: from ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.64.37.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:13:25 +0100 Received: from rasmus by ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:13:25 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Libreoffice has a nice feature called AutoFit → Optimal width of columns. This seems to minimized the width of tables. By default Org sets the width to 100% which looks horrible for small tables. From this helpful post I gather that it can be fixed by a macro. http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/18664/optimal-column-width-for-all-tables-in-odt-documents/ Is there any way to call macros from ox-odt? It seems you can call LO with the -invisible flag to apply macros without bothering the user... Anybody got experience in this regard? —Rasmus -- With monopolies the cake is a lie!