From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [RFC] Draft mode Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:01:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2rbr5r9.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87io6w9p7y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87io6vd7vl.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgI98-0007bz-3C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:02:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgI94-0006L6-U2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:02:06 -0400 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:54540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgI94-0006Kf-Ni for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:02:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B95F6F2005 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-zNlJ7sJ566 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (103-115.echostar.pl [213.156.103.115]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19A616F2003 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:01:37 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87io6vd7vl.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2015-09-27, at 20:39, Rasmus wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> The following patch implements a draft mode for export. When in draft >> mode, invalid macros and links do not throw an error. It can be toggled >> with `org-export-as-draft' variable, or using C-d in export dispatch. I would welcome this feature... > Can this just be a variable set by BIND or publish? The interest of such > functionality seems to be limited to people who maintain > broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to warrant > prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think 'draft' is > the correct word for this, but that's of course minor. > >> It introduces a backward incompatible change since it modifies signature >> from `org-export-as' and alike. > > Doesn't seem worth it. ...but I agree with the above. Also, wouldn't it be even better if there were some buffer - like (La)TeX's log file - accumulating all the errors/warnings from the exporting process? Then, the above behavior could be the default, but it would produce warnings. Or it might depend on some setting. > Rasmus Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University