From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix `org-capture-templates' type declaration Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2qb9cn3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h9lg88mh.fsf@univ-nantes.fr> <87fv0zbast.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnbngjgl.fsf@univ-nantes.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNR3-000406-EK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:42:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNR2-0002s8-IY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:42:17 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:33764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNR2-0002s2-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:42:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bnbngjgl.fsf@univ-nantes.fr> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Gr=C3=A9goire?= Jadi"'s message of "Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:34:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=A9goire?= Jadi Cc: Org Mode Gr=C3=A9goire Jadi writes: > With my patch, the customization interface looks like this > - for a file : > Target location: Value Menu File: > File: Value Menu File: ~/org/notes.org > > - for a variable : > Target location: Value Menu File: > File: Value Menu Variable: nil > > - for a function : > Target location: Value Menu File: > File: Value Menu Function: ignore > > - for an Emacs Lisp form : > Target location: Value Menu File: > File: Value Menu Lisp expression: nil > > What kind of rendering do you think would be better/clearer? :tag " File" is misleading. Perhaps " File, variable, function or S-expression" would be clearer, if a bit longish. Not sure how to make this beast clearer anyway. Regards,