From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Subject: Re: Adding new switch or header Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:24:44 +0000 Message-ID: <87k2pxoexv.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87r3k7xen4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87d1vrhvf4.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3k6vj8i.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87si4mkuc6.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1nk-0005Z1-10 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:24:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1nh-0005T8-Do for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:24:48 -0500 Received: from cheviot22.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.234.22]:40557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1nh-0005Sr-8l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:24:45 -0500 Received: from smtpauth-vm.ncl.ac.uk ([10.8.233.129] helo=smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk) by cheviot22.ncl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1ng-0003LZ-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:24:44 +0000 Received: from jangai.ncl.ac.uk ([10.66.67.223] helo=localhost) by smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1ng-0006vK-9P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:24:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87si4mkuc6.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:05:45 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 3 Nov 2015 at 21:57, Phillip Lord wrote: > > [...] > >> Are these form of attributes specific to the source block which they >> precede? Or is it possible to do any kind of inheritance with them? For >> my use case, all the code blocks inside a Header One block will behave >> in the same way (either with \[ escaping or without). > > No idea! Maybe Nicolas can help here as I assume this is all a function > of the parser. No worries. Many thanks for the feedback. Phil