From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Request: Move org-eww from contrib to core Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2fra9ff.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87zioprcje.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWgzc-0000IA-AB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:37:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWgzb-0005bu-Dk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:37:08 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:50426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWgzb-0005bf-6p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:37:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zioprcje.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:13:25 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Matt Lundin Cc: Marco Wahl , Org Mode Hello, Matt Lundin writes: > Given that the coming release of emacs 25 ships with the eww browser, I > think it would be worthwhile to make org-eww.el a core org-mode module. > I have been using eww instead of emacs-w3m for some time now with no > problems. Since org ships with support for emacs-w3m, an external > package, it seems to makes sense also to support eww, the built-in > browser. In this case, we need to add a mechanism to throw an error when this module is loaded without Eww being available. As a reminder, Org 9 still supports Emacs 24.3. > I noticed that Marco Wahl, the author of org-eww.el, is on the > contributors list, so, if I understand correctly, there shouldn't be > copyright issues. There could be if we integrated patches from people without FSF assignment. I didn't check, but I don't think it happened though. If Marco Wahl (Cc'ed) agrees and the change above is made, we could indeed add the module to core. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou