From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document undocumented undocumented behavior in two org-timestamp-up and org-timestamp-down Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:08:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1t2gs99.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9S1Z-0007ls-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:08:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9S1V-0006Td-Lh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:08:09 -0400 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:55239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9S1V-0006O2-F7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:08:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Eggenberger's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:04:05 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Andrew Eggenberger Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Andrew Eggenberger writes: > Document org-timestamp-up and org-timestamp-down behavior. Applied. Thank you. Would it make sense to update the manual accordingly? If so, would you want to do it? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou