From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:20:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87k1mgemlg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAKJTzL6t4pVLVfT4x=eniYVNu7QcKPY7qNZ-xOiaWEm_BVGCSA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59937)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1gClkf-0006qS-UV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:20:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1gClkd-0007ql-8W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:20:41 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:44667)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1gClkd-0007Zu-0y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:20:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAKJTzL6t4pVLVfT4x=eniYVNu7QcKPY7qNZ-xOiaWEm_BVGCSA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Nik Clayton's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:04:10 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nik Clayton <nik@ngo.org.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Nik Clayton <nik@ngo.org.uk> writes:

> I'd like to propose a couple of changes / enhancements to how org-export
> exports some data in to HTML files to make it slightly easier to style
> those files.
>
> The first is re line-numbers.

[...]

> Couple of questions before I write a patch:
>
> a) Does that sound reasonable?
> b) Should this replace the current approach, or be an option that can be
> toggled by a customisation?

My HTML/CSS knowledge is feeble. But it does sound reasonable, if
there's no loss of feature and compatibility.

A patch would be nice for users exporting to HTML who want to test the
behaviour.

> And the second is re languages associated with exported SRC blocks.

[...]

> I see there's already some code that tries to show language badges on hover
> (which doesn't work for me for some reason, I haven't dug in to why).
>
> Does this change sound reasonable?

Ditto.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou