Re: [PATCH] orgweb: Update org-ruby link (tools)

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

> On 09/06/2024 02:18, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Max Nikulin writes:
>>> ... I have tried to blindly update zh-CN file. Likely it should be
>>> done more accurately.
>> 
>> Yes. Let's not fiddle with Chinese version. It is already out of sync,
>> but we cannot do much unless we get someone Chinese-speaking volunteer.
>
> Feel free to skip chunks you do not like.

Applied.
I retained the old description in the Chinese translation.
https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/orgweb/commit/96072c43b4a497f614f3bb4251da341b9df3b5b9
https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/orgweb/commit/29cbf1f4b433f6dc008aad1a71a9b60367740d33

>>> Would it be acceptable to add an additional link to the dedicated page
>>> on Worg?
>>> [[https://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-ruby.html][Worg]]
>> 
>> Yes, but I'd prefer if such link would be not just a text link, but
>> something more compact. Maybe something like "wiki" button on top-left
>> corner of the logo.
>
> I do not like and idea of a button over an active link.
>
> Since org-ruby has no its own logo I would consider 3 smaller links instead:
> - https://github.com/wallyqs/org-ruby with the github logo
> - https://rubygems.org/gems/org-ruby with the current gem icon
> - https://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-ruby.html with styled 
> "Worg" text.

I do not mind as long as the overall style remains consistent. Feel free
to submit a patch.

>> Note that the extended tools page on
>> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-tools/index.html already has the link you proposed.
>
> Formally it is more appropriate for 
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-translators.html "Org-mode Import/Export 
> Tools". (I have no idea why this page is not in the org-tools folder.)

Historical, I guess.
We may move it, but I am not sure if it is a big deal.

> From my point of view, when a user sees the ruby icon nothing suggests 
> that, besides clicking on the link, they may find additional info on a 
> page linked from another page accessible through a link at the bottom of 
> the current one.

That's true. On the other hand, tools page is not really a Wiki.
It is ok to put some links to the wiki/worg, but not at the cost of
information overloading.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>