From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id GEECHUR+YGe60QAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:23:48 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GEECHUR+YGe60QAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:23:48 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=FqGaTGMH; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1734377028; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=qMVaq5Nd59HKbS7yPLtNLNNLi63VR7t7Gy/n7D5VCqM=; b=DDLALCarDffwwxrY1+txhraYTUlloEM9CftdDzsDcEd858FX96hyOj8w7VALwVDMEGW1cM WEo3YuVV/oPKICQ224wiZ1Ix3EqHvkGh8IviCJ7GVP1Vzw2Mp6HQP0/FZbOzlsyqfTHMsW LFGdiOvZvjkl10807A2YRtFF0kyjdrs0c1INDlEQ+MufiTefi5S17LMIWENrhXVrz7k9Yy e/IQGeJPXsc+0HTyabGj3UUyP8KqxqFv3rhjtMwovfApIxe49y3CzFNp25S2NDQk+CMTcz pTZI9xf1j+mLKZzDNHMMt5bX57607evHz5krbGUvVBmf8auguLxeWUuxjB5weQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=FqGaTGMH; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1734377028; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eAam3S9nJ7NCGK9FvM0dYnI1TyxTTHCcpIQAQ4EffrSdJ2dZES9tQb+smUgUZkwNcNFy3g usAiSFxeWHRjn6ia+XYvIUkBODNSXXrhVCONFdPcoP92W2PE2fxSqw62fg7K0WMm29yTOT DdsZhabcHa/nFiDjQ/IyluMjUy0c4snAylimQq/ndanSt6xPVAjPjMTCFX6m+xwmkhaXrg D13JqRstG5FNU4sCMoqJgB+v13MWeferiC2YXcoQkN5GTd7vC23wv2Vc40hsEzXYPj/jBF Qq2NHH0cn5Fk7FGwuLwJXj5GpGVWvtvqhNnW5QcWJdu98YvnYt45cHVd48xZ7g== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A00678943 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:23:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGRM-0008Cl-NM; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:07:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGRH-0008CC-9j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:07:32 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGRB-0001w9-9Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:07:28 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96E4240027 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:07:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1734376041; bh=vrxAVstgDUTs728oJUK5Aygi5uCAoX1BtwbM2YpSYzI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=FqGaTGMHMDzlDJiS8rq+CD07soQk+mUm+JOUWTQUBJj72R91Q/9YjQCchr97oBz3l mHVdFqZLDmE0lFxni4fWUWN8eYUv4w06Brx76mO3s8rSnVHFF6OiF4gC/irvhsuHlS 0+8CxsLH/3rEoVmSGEG2w2XhDN8zSQgqtZmwtFXyMTABqOtTGVo+jVCnYQM/lq+9GK tQET25/rOMa1WXd88hUmRzIIobz7CLJC9/Y+ia0w9/d1QlwfTtpf+wcdLNYfEDv78V v3bFTW2a4cG9m8mlEnecPFXHKYNXMIP1PD4jMkEh1Qt5pewIjLo/09oBqFH7Dy8LT3 Ofld6ZznA1ZsQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YBqFP1zpqz9rxB; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:07:21 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: alain.cochard@unistra.fr Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Problem installing Org using the Emacs packaging system In-Reply-To: <26434.1724.554991.978456@frac.u-strasbg.fr> References: <26434.1724.554991.978456@frac.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzbzcuny.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0A00678943 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.28 X-Spam-Score: -4.28 X-TUID: ftNEP1P1bUPx Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes: > Hello. An excerpt of the page > > https://orgmode.org/manual/Installation.html > > is > ... > emacs -Q -batch -eval "(progn (require 'package) (package-initialize) > (package-refresh-contents) (package-upgrade 'org))" > > I have used the emacs batch command above on a number of machines but it > always failed (see below), so I guess I am doing something wrong, but what? I suspect that it is some kind of bug in Emacs 29. It seems that the command is only properly working in Emacs 30. I am not sure how I overlooked the problem. Maybe forgot to test things on older Emacs somehow. I think that we should: 1. Remove this from Org 9.7 manual (bugfix) 2. Add a note that the one-liner requires Emacs 30 in the Org 9.8-re manual (main) > Anyway, is it correct that one does not need this command to avoid the > above mentioned interferences, provided that a single Emacs session is > running, and in which no org file has been visited (.org or otherwise)? Yup. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at