From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nuutti Kotivuori Subject: Re: Numeric Priorities Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:02:25 +0300 Message-ID: <87ir60s4vy.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> References: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> <7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl> <87ps0rx65n.fsf_-_@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> <87odfsfmk2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZliA-0008AJ-Eo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:02:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZli8-00089x-QF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:02:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZli8-00089t-NC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:02:44 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZli8-0004YH-5e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:02:44 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IZli3-00015j-VG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:02:39 +0000 Received: from naked.iki.fi ([62.142.249.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:02:39 +0000 Received: from naked by naked.iki.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:02:39 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dmitri Minaev wrote: > But Nuutti offered to interpret the absent priority as the default > one, and I prefer to differentiate between the unrated entries and > the entries with a priority. If I haven't understood this completely wrong, it *is* interpreted as the same! That is, entries with no priority are sorted at the same spot as entries with the default priority - and entries with lower than default priority are sorted below them. If you are not talking about sorting, then I don't know what you are talking about - since sorting is the only thing I can see priorities affecting, otherwise they are just letters on a line with no special significance. -- Naked