From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BABEL] evaluation of R code in export
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:53:41 -0600
Message-ID: <87iq3z63e3.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <4C47FF10.1020808@mail.com> <87tynqcct8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<4C4D3EEC.6010703@mail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44956 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oe8PA-0006jF-Kh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:18:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Oe8P9-0006Y5-JY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:18:48 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:60203)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Oe8P9-0006Xx-G1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:18:47 -0400
Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6173817iwn.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> On 23/07/2010 19:45, Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Hi Rainer,
>> 
>> I general it is useful to have the results of Babel-evaluated code
>> appear in the session history as it can help for debugging.
>
> Ok - agreed. The results are quite useful - but I would prefer the
> history of the commands in the R session which is accessible by C-up to
> not include the commands issued - but I can live with it as it is now.
>

Hi Rainer,

I have found no good answer for sending commands to an inferior process
w/o adding them to the history ring.  There is one possible way forward,
the investigation of which is now on the task stack for babel
development but probably won't happen in the near future.

Best -- Eric