From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] htmlp and latexp Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:09:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87ipw2ejyr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D5B8E60.4070307@christianmoe.com> <871v38s1gw.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3mpekpg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33486 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuUx3-0005Z2-0E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:09:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuUx1-0001bz-Sa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:09:40 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:40347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuUx1-0001bm-Ie for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:09:39 -0500 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so6069266fxm.0 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:09:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Dan Davison's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:08:57 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dan Davison Cc: Org , mail@christianmoe.com Hi Dan, Dan Davison writes: > Incidentally, I would suggest that org-current-export-file and > org-current-export-dir are renamed so that they are within the > org-export-* namespace. Agreed. Please provide a patch if you have time. > There are other areas of Org where I think the > naming should be standardised, notably in org-src.el: the distinction > between org-src-* and org-edit-src-* is unclear IMO. I leave this decision to Erik, this is *his* namespace :) > I think this is > kind of important, because in learning emacs one does makes use of these > namespace conventions, e.g. C-h v TAB. I agree. > How much change > would there be if we demanded that *all* variables defined in org-foo.el > are named within the org-foo-* namespace? I don't know. Let's undertake this work progressively. -- Bastien