From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Conflict between Org-Mode versions?
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <87iptw65wb.fsf@mean.albasani.net>
References: <617335.71813.qm@web161902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<4433.1303935870@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<252417.15567.qm@web161903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<87zknaej1w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<790495.34626.qm@web161916.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<6571.1304107112@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46494)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1QG1tL-0004Ua-IS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:34:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1QG1tK-0005Cm-Ic
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:34:51 -0400
Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60711)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1QFwff-0007H7-4G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:00:23 -0400
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1QFwfd-00051H-Jp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:00:21 +0200
Received: from e178220156.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.220.156])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:00:21 +0200
Received: from gegendosenfleisch by e178220156.adsl.alicedsl.de with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:00:21 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> IIRC, Carsten had run a poll for the nomination of the 50 most-use{d|ful}
> variables. The results must be somewhere (Worg? Mailing list?). That
> would probably serve as a better starting point than a 931-element list
> with no other indicator of importance.

,----[http://orgmode.org/worg/org-configs/org-customization-survey.html ?]
| Date: 2011-04-28 13:46:43 UTC
| Author: Charles Cave
| Org version 7.5 with Emacs version 23
`----

But it somehow feels wrong to ask a html page for a "better starting
point" ...  

To clarify wrong: Not "emacsy'.

-Memnon