From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>
Subject: Re: Schedule event
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 14:38:13 -0500
Message-ID: <87ipqa8h5m.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
References: <877h6raiwc.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<C0530846-22AF-4440-AF28-8485C85EC05F@uva.nl>
	<807h6qk2jq.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55601)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>) id 1QpmhN-00065B-0e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:38:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>) id 1QpmhL-0001z3-PO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:38:16 -0400
Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:36249)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>) id 1QpmhL-0001yy-LR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:38:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <807h6qk2jq.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of
	"Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:00:41 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, dominik@uva.nl
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place these
>> time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to implement.
>
> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great!  Maybe that clarifies the
> bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones are
> without any keyword.

I agree, a special keyword for events would clarify the issue.  It would
also make this part of the manual easier to understand:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Deadlines-and-scheduling

> In that case, I'd opt for EVENT or some such in favor of APPT. Just think at
> birthdays, or a TV show: qualifying them as APPT is a bit limitative, IMHO.
> EVENT seems a more general term.

I also like the EVENT keyword.

Regards,
Jason