From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: Column view does not function properly in Agenda buffers [7.7] Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87ippv6vbx.fsf@altern.org> References: <87k4acnky4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qtwrt-0007Ug-OY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:18:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qtwrs-0000gO-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:18:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:41452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qtwrs-0000gE-Bz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:18:20 -0400 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so3772746wwj.0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:18:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Christian Schmidt's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:31:21 +0200 (CEST)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Schmidt Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Christian, Christian Schmidt writes: > I can confirm, that this bug is fixed! This is just brilliant! Thank > you very much! Thanks for confirming. > The first minor concern: > ======================== > There is a leading star '*' in front of the ITEM. > Could you remove this star '*', too? Fixed. > The second minor concern: > ========================= > In a column-view, that is invoked inside Agenda buffer, there are > lines, that seperate the todos for each day in the agenda. In version > 7.5 those lines contained the corresponding date to give orientation. Is this with a standard agenda view? Which one? If that's from an `org-agenda-custom-commands' can you share it? > I don't want to appear greedy and I am already content with your > bugfix so far. But maybe you've got the time to look after my two > minor concerns mentioned above. I'll try to fix the problem when I fully understand it :) Best, -- Bastien