From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeremiah.dodds@gmail.com Subject: Re: Displaying or linking to definitions of terms? Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:49:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87ipj2cx3w.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8762f43u63.fsf@gmail.com> <87boovw1xx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzEeL-0007vu-DI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:50:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzEeJ-0000F6-Gu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:50:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:33637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzEeJ-0000Eu-AX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:50:27 -0500 Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so5932603pbc.0 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:50:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87boovw1xx.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:30:02 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > There are probably a lot of ways to achieve this with included tools. > For example, on a per file basis, you may use radio targets: > > #+begin_src org > Contempt for happiness is usually contempt for other people's happiness, > and is an elegant hatred for the human race. > > * Definitions > > - <<>> :: pleasingly graceful and stylish in appearance or > manner; pleasingly ingenious and simple. > #+end_src > > Note that you have to activate <<>> radio target the first time > you introduce it (with C-c C-c), but present and future radio targets > will be liked to it automatically. > > > Regards, Thanks, I had somehow totally forgot about the '<<>>' targets, they'll probably serve my purposes for the time being.