From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: URGENT Bug with exporting org source block Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:08:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87iphjpbo3.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87k420u9qo.fsf@gmx.com> <87vcljq5rt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bonbwrjn.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEPD0-0007BG-LX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:08:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEPCy-0000lD-Mv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:08:58 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEPCy-0000l9-Fm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:08:56 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SEPCw-0001Rx-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:08:54 +0200 Received: from pd9eb4dde.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.77.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:08:54 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb4dde.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:08:54 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte writes: > This is odd. The first time I ran the test suite this test failed for > me as well, however on all subsequent runs of the test suite this test > passed, and manually looking through the test the code indeed does seem > to be acting as it should. I can confirm that it runs through when I force emacs to run the test two times in succession. However, this seems to be a fluke really. The test failure is related to the fact that the test file has two different definitions for noweb-example1 and noweb-example2 and there is also a call to noweb-example that doesn't have a definition at all. Why all that ends up with test-point == nil I don't know... Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds