From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: new exporter Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:32:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipdrpl5n.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <3C38420E-E2FA-4CAB-B3FD-9C5F8584E60A@gmail.com> <81fwadrgoo.fsf@gmail.com> <87396dzlai.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <871ulqgb4t.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5nyx4ku.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9zq7htj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4t261fw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3yu15wj.fsf@gmail.com> <87395hkj7u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9gwmet.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87pq8j2a0y.fsf@gmail.com> <87r4sy3rve.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9d1eif.fsf@gmail.com> <878veo6d1a.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87d340u077.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spkf9-0000s1-LW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:32:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spkf8-0002hl-9p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:32:23 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spkf8-0002hY-2z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:32:22 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Spkf4-0006wR-1V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:32:18 +0200 Received: from pd9eb3f94.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.63.148]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:32:17 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb3f94.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:32:17 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > In fact, I do get the errors from a "make test" but I don't know how to > reproduce them from emacs. For starters you could try to run Emacs like "make test" does, but remove "-batch". This error somehow seems to involve that the test always returns "'left 'left 'right" rather than what the tests expects. > Also, I cannot determine when they appeared for the first time: I tried > various points back in time, but they always seem to be present. Yes, that has been my impression as well. Again, I can make them go away by removing one of the byte-compiled files, so I rather suspect another case of a macro expansion that's not quite what was intented. Only this time I really don't see from the backtrace what that would be. >> Tracebacks for the two new test errors: > > The two new errors should be gone. Thank you. Thanks. I meanwhile had figured that the limit parameter was missing, but not if it should always be (point-max). However since you did make that mistake yourself, maybe you could reconsider the function signature and perhaps making limit optional and replacing it with (point-max) if not present (reads as nil)? It seems that it would unclutter the code for the typical use... Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds