From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: [ANN] outorg.el -- reverse Org-Babel Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:13:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip5yb4xl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mwvabeuk.fsf@gmail.com> <86r4kmffqc.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U56JI-00085n-L4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:13:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U56JH-0000tX-55 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:13:32 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U56JG-0000tM-UG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:13:31 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U56JW-0000m2-Ju for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:13:46 +0100 Received: from g231224149.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.224.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:13:46 +0100 Received: from tjolitz by g231224149.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:13:46 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org François Pinard writes: Hi, Francois, > Just from reading your description, "outorg" seems strangely similar to > "poporg" (https://github.com/pinard/poporg), which I announced on this > list maybe two weeks ago. I would presume you missed it? :-) I missed that completely, you can check the code - there should be no similarities whatsoever. I was entirely inspired by my recent discovery of the possibilities of outline-minor-mode and Org-Babel. What a bad luck ... ;( But anyway, probably the best we can do is to bring both version to a usable state and then let the users decide if they want to use it - and which one. At first glance, the projects seem so different that a merge appears impossible or just to much work - and not worth the pain. > I'll save myself a pointer to "outorg", for later perusing and study. I'll do the same thing with 'poporg' ;) -- cheers, Thorsten