From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Terbeck Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make `org-contacts-message-complete-function' work with byte compilation Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:48:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip4yavzf.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> References: <87sj449hcb.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <87ppz6on3b.fsf@tanger.home> <87vc8yjusl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqtemgv0.fsf@tanger.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF350-0006hE-Om for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:47:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF34w-0004db-Bh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:47:54 -0400 Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.25]:37095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF34w-0004dP-5E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:47:50 -0400 Received: from [149.201.42.55] (helo=jim.voodoo.lan) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1UF34t-0000nD-Pl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:47:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wqtemgv0.fsf@tanger.home> (daimrod@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:21:39 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Daimrod wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: >> Daimrod writes: >>> @All: Can I use (require 'cl) and ignore the warning or is there better >>> solution? >> >> You could if this would never go into mainline, where it is not allowed >> due to the namespace pollution that cl causes. You could use cl-lib >> instead, but then this would be an Emacs-24 only solution. In general, >> the stanza ((eval-when-compile (require 'cl)) only works as intended >> when you are only using cl macros, but you seem to use defuns. You >> could check how hard it is to replace these with plain elisp, aside from >> syntactical inconveniences this is usually not a big problem. > > I've done this, thanks for the advice. I've just given the latest git HEAD version a spin and it seems to work as expected. Thanks for taking an interesting and fixing this so promptly. ;) Regards, Frank