From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: generic page breaks for export? Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:45:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87ip3ywaqi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87hajjxdib.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87txniy45q.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOsd6-00070G-CX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:39:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOsd0-0004He-AZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:39:44 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOsd0-0004HJ-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:39:38 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOscy-00057w-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:39:36 +0200 Received: from 114.250.135.46 ([114.250.135.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:39:36 +0200 Received: from eric by 114.250.135.46 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:39:36 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> It seems like enough of org's export formats have the concept of page >> breaks that a generic syntax might be warranted -- I'm finding myself >> doing lots of exporting to multiple formats. What do people think of >> that? Emacs already has a convention of using ascii 12 as a page >> delimiter (though control characters in the buffer look ugly), or we >> could introduce something like #+PAGEBREAK, or perhaps both. >> >> If this seems desirable, I'll take a stab at a patch. > > Thank you for the offer. Though, I don't think it's worth implementing > it. > > For navigation, Org has better tools than page break jumping. So, it > would only be related to export. Even in that case, adding a keyword > (#+PAGEBREAK, but that would be some irregular syntax since there's no > value attached) for such a simple thing is hardly a benefit: > > #+latex: \newline > > Sure, when exporting to multiple formats, it can save a line or two. > Nothing earth-shaking here. Fair enough: you're right it's only good for export, and even then only really useful for multiple formats. On the other hand, the ^L character is just sitting there, begging to be handled...