From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: New exporter and dates in tables Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:45:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87ip3p5ipz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fvz1opiz.fsf@norang.ca> <8761zxwlvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9pntym.fsf@norang.ca> <0604BF00-1FE8-4EAA-A346-C125A5127CAD@gmail.com> <877gkcvm3n.fsf@gmail.com> <173ADFE7-A1FB-4ECB-A78A-C99662A8030F@gmail.com> <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9mh6ex.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2u1s3wf.fsf@gmail.com> <8738uxrrtc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwt2aefz.fsf@gmail.com> <874nfa34vj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehee9vz6.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip3p8mun.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqs58c7h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNFO-0001uF-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:45:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNFN-0008Ma-7V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:45:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:58058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNFN-0008MQ-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:45:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so795182wib.15 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 06:45:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wqs58c7h.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:37:54 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > According to your suggestion, with `org-export-with-timestamps' set to > `not-standalone', in the following example: > > * Task > > > At , I must do that. > > the first would be ignored, not the second one. Isn't it > what you want? Yes, exactly. -- Bastien