From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: skip:t option not working Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:00:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87iozdifxu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <520590C6.8050701@gmail.com> <87r4e2i74w.fsf@gmail.com> <520670BC.4060008@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8DTN-0004ev-04 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:01:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8DTF-0008Iz-Mj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:01:04 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8DTF-0008Ir-Ga for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:00:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V8DTD-0000jr-Jb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:00:55 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:00:55 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:00:55 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Scott Randby writes: > On 08/09/2013 10:58 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >> Scott Randby writes: >> >>> I cannot get the skip:t option to work with HTML export. This option is >>> listed in the manual, and it worked before Org-8. Am I missing >>> something? Below is a simple sample in which skip:t doesn't work, even >>> with emacs -q. I'm using Emacs 24.2.1 with Org 8.0.3. >>> >> >> I don't think it exists any longer. >> > > If the option no longer exists, then it might be a good idea to remove > it from the manual. > Indeed, but afaict, it's no longer in the current (8.0.7) manual. Are you looking at an older version of the manual perhaps? I might have missed the reference of course, in which case if you post the details, somebody will fix it. -- Nick