From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [bug?][patch] Org LaTeX Fragments Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:22:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87ioy7qt68.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87d2ofu0dm.fsf@gmx.us> <878uz38pxm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJmGC-0004Bl-D3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJmG6-0003a8-Dn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:16 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJmG6-0003a0-7p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:10 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VJmG4-0007n0-D3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:23:08 +0200 Received: from 109.144.228.101 ([109.144.228.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:23:08 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 109.144.228.101 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:23:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I think `org-format-latex-header' shouldn't load amsmath at all. That's another possibility. >> The first patch adds amsmath as a dependency which fixes the above >> bug. According to my TeXLive it seems amstext is distributed with >> amsmath, so I don't think that's an issue. Increased load time? >> Well, maybe. I didn't test. > > It's not about load time, but about compatibility with other packages. > I think some of them don't coexist well with amsmath. "amssymb" and > "amstext" are less demanding in that area. Except for the odd, typically, symbol package that should be loaded after amsmath I'm not aware of any such cases. I thought that nath might have been an issue, but even that supports amsmath. http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/nath –Rasmus -- The Kids call him Billy the Saint