From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: #+INCLUDE: myfile.html html does not include /literally/; Org processes Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:02:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87iookzsto.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <538AA6B8.40604@gmail.com> <8761kl12w9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bnudf2u4.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqd1yo84.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8738fpeyov.fsf@gmail.com> <87sinpylly.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r438eujq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr5PE-0004J1-AD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 09:02:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr5P8-0001qc-33 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 09:02:32 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr5P7-0001q7-TA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 09:02:26 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr5P6-00084B-50 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:02:24 +0200 Received: from pd9eb3aac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.58.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:02:24 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb3aac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:02:24 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > As explained in this thread, it is not necessary to support: > > #+INCLUDE: "file.ext" wrap center I'm still not getting your argument or I misunderstand what you're trying to say. Using "wrap" should produce an export block and nothing else. So as long as there can be no export block named "center", the INCLUDE above would simply raise a user-error (yes, that check isn't in the quick&dirty patch I posted). And since I think the list of NAMES that fit this description and is known in advance (by org syntax) and short, that check is cheap. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves