From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Invalid function: org-babel-header-args-safe-fn in Melpa Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:36:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87io1r6yh3.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87povzb83m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUzev-0007uI-Q2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:36:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUzes-0002D7-Jx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:36:29 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUzes-0002C9-CH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:36:26 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUzej-0005b7-Ix for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:36:17 +0100 Received: from p54b4660e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.180.102.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:36:17 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by p54b4660e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:36:17 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aaron Ecay writes: > This looks like the kind of problem that results when org is byte-compiled > in an emacs with a different version of org loaded. This used to be a > problem when installing via package.el (and not just for org), but I think > there has been some work put into making sure it doesn’t happen any more. > (I know emacs developers were discussing them and then they seemed to go > away so I assumed they were fixed...it’s possible I was mistaken though.) No, this is bug #10125 and the others that it was merged with (most recently #21267, with the exact same error message as John got). > If I had to guess, I’d say that line 63 of packages.el in your jmax > setup defeats these fixes. Try commenting it out. It should not be > necessary to manually byte-compile packages: package.el should do that > for you. And in this case, I hypothesize that it is actually harmful. Yes it is. Although I'd venture to guess that it would have happened anyway. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables