From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:42:13 +0800 Message-ID: <87inzq6v7e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oa9ivc6w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mvp26vem.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5N8-0008ND-D2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:45:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5N5-0003wH-6Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:45:10 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5N4-0003wC-VX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:45:07 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5N2-0005lQ-Dg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:45:05 +0200 Received: from 222.128.163.222 ([222.128.163.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:45:04 +0200 Received: from eric by 222.128.163.222 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:45:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> On Saturday, 9 Apr 2016 at 18:09, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations >>>> for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... >>> >>> eww ;-) >> >> I use this as my first port of call typically. For many of the web >> sites I visit, it does the job very well. > > I really should get used to using eww for basic browsing. It's silly, > but I think one of the obstacles has simply been that I haven't s Ahem... What I meant to say is that I haven't spent the time to figure out a quick, intuitive way to say "open *this* link in eww... now open *this* link in my external browser", etc. That was all.