From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: setting local variables Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87ingbm75b.fsf@gmx.us> References: <871sotiqld.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2wsly88.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877eykbpho.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wp5dmkm0.fsf@gmx.us> <87h8wh13tm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y3psp5ne.fsf@gmx.us> <87mv68159v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h8wgov62.fsf@gmx.us> <87fuc0asaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3pr7pn2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874lsfaho3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pob2opic.fsf@gmx.us> <87k21azncs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bmmm4kny.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <08f7ca4a-a19e-8dcb-b877-d306dda5c5b4@gmail.com> <87vakco0f5.fsf@gmx.us> <877ewr7t8j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvJy1-0000ZB-Bl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 05:09:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvJxx-0004zC-Ah for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 05:09:49 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40808 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvJxx-0004yb-3x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 05:09:45 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvJxn-00088z-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:09:35 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> yes, I am aware that LaTeX does use unnumbered for this, but this is >> backend specific implementation, and not an argument about the logic of >> this approach. > > Fair enough. I reverted the commit. > > I think a :NOTOC: property to ignore headlines from TOC is an acceptable > solution, even though it add yet another property. > > I also suggest to classify LaTeX issue as "wontfix". IMO, in ox-latex, "num" should only affect secnumdepth. I don’t think the current behavior is very good. Having numbered and unnumbered in the TOC can be archived using e.g. KOMA-Script (there’s also a sty on github breaking out the relevant part of of KOMA-Script) and adding a new class to org-latex-classes. -- Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand?