From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Ruy Exel <ruyexel@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Confusing org-cycle invocation when cursor is in invisible text
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 23:57:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87incu1kmh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB8Wf+_x5rhcc7xQG8Sj4LPWFntdEO+nJMS+q548Cfzn0jGkkw@mail.gmail.com> (Ruy Exel's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:51:18 -0200")
Hello,
Ruy Exel <ruyexel@gmail.com> writes:
> Consider the following simple tree structure
>
> -----
>
> * Trees
> ** Pine
> It is a conifer
> ** Oak
> Place cursor here ->
> It belongs to the genus Quercus
>
> -----
>
> If you place the cursor where indicated (i.e. after the sentence
> "Place cursor here ->" above) and press <Shift-TAB> (org-shifttab),
> your buffer will show
>
> * Trees...
>
> with the cursor placed on the first of the three dots. If you then go
> to the kitchen to prepare a coffee and come back, you will probably
> not going to remember where the cursor was before the visibility went
> to the OVERVIEW state. Suppose you then decide to expand your tree by
> pressing <TAB> (org-cycle) without having changed cursor position. In
> this case your buffer will turn to
>
> * Trees...
> ** Oak
> Place cursor here ->
> It belongs to the genus Quercus
>
> and you might then be led to thinking that your header "Trees" has
> only one sub-header, namely "Oak". Yes I know that the three dots
> after "Trees" is meant to indicate that there is still some hidden
> text but, given that your intention was to expand "Trees" and that you
> pressed the correct key for this purpose you might (incorrectly) feel
> assured that you achieved the appropriate goal and hence not pay due
> attention to the three dots.
>
> The point I want to raise is that I believe users should not be
> required to remember the position of the cursor when it falls inside
> hiddent text. Even more so, the state of the system at any given time
> should not depend on said position.
>
> Thus, after the first press of <Shift-TAB>, above, the cursor should
> go by default to the beginning (maybe the end) of the hidden text.
I agree the current situation is not satisfactory, but I also think TAB
or S-TAB should never, ever, move point. For example, I use S-TAB to get
a quick overview of the structure of the document.
I fixed this by making TAB show more when called from an invisible part
of the buffer.
Thank you for the report.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-25 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-15 20:51 Confusing org-cycle invocation when cursor is in invisible text Ruy Exel
2017-12-25 22:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87incu1kmh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=ruyexel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).