From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: recent org-mode changes: completion of repeated tasks reports "10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today" Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:43:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87imyqhthf.fsf@norang.ca> References: <87wonbdzc0.fsf@gnu.org> <739521c7-7864-8b86-3223-8fb9f9335a36@oracle.com> <87pnt0a65g.fsf@norang.ca> <5451cd6f-2bbb-362d-d4b0-897af89c1807@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjPwT-0005mL-KE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:43:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjPwR-0001FO-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:43:49 -0500 Received: from outbound1a.eu.mailhop.org ([52.58.109.202]:12093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjPwO-00015S-79 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:43:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5451cd6f-2bbb-362d-d4b0-897af89c1807@oracle.com> (Daniel Ortmann's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:02:01 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Daniel Ortmann Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Daniel Ortmann writes: > No other tasks.=C2=A0 Here is the complete text with only one url removed: > > * TODO [#C] p6 time entry > =C2=A0 DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d> > =C2=A0 :PROPERTIES: > =C2=A0 :LAST_REPEAT: [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] > =C2=A0 :END: > =C2=A0 :LOGBOOK: > > On 1/13/19 10:12 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > > Daniel Ortmann writes: > > I have a weekly scheduled task with ... > =C2=A0 DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d> >=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Recently, when I complete the task it reports the following: >=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Clock stopped at [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] after 0:05 > 10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today.= =C2=A0 > Continue? (y or n) n >=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Thoughts? >=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Hi Daniel, >=20=20=20=20=20 > Do you have some other repeating timestamp buried somewhere in that > task? It is probably moving that one forward and it is the one that > needs more than 10 repeats to become current. >=20=20=20=20=20 > There was a recent change that updates all repeating timestamps in the > task. >=20=20=20=20=20 > Regards, > Bernt Sorry I can't reproduce what you are seeing. Regards, Bernt