From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6O/qCq+aVV+AagAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 02:27:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id gLbCBq+aVV+4SwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 02:27:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA1B9404D8 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 02:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kF6su-0002nz-Gh for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 22:27:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kF6sa-0002nr-BZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 22:27:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]:43860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kF6sY-0002GG-DE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 22:27:35 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id t14so1873752pgl.10 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 19:27:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=pKdxGiSBrxVInVbaqITMiR2h8L7z3fHC/j4grSw9+AA=; b=SnqsfofOrxURe+37Sowywn5QDuV/Khmej7mKaL8scP1betjFmF6HQGqc/zhZl5SsHU K8gnYe4Co1xEBLFDrC6HfdfkvnxPjpIXc3mioCxYclZPNPOPR407h8c+4Ws+bonEH836 XShRrNTvsVCIrN0oX282XENFMMuGtBKHTST6TcyDQdkglEoM8RXdyjIk9NVdH+iPCGxQ /eIzlf6NZIQLoWh+F/2dAuKYnM1mlMFbNqn/tMZX88QIvYKr8CTILOT7pV0AMAqlvPfr xkc8s4LVzoAwsg9M9/rJBFMaJm9FewivzpEbwz3stkp3/YLu+N1oddHhQHi96MvafaRi DP9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=pKdxGiSBrxVInVbaqITMiR2h8L7z3fHC/j4grSw9+AA=; b=sloVSvScoqoqO+meSjcVhERFDvcREM+rGrm9TSAZM2EiBCSd8ghvW+Xjq6SNw5V72F oqSODFcxnn3zw94pxC6rcDQ6lxMozaRoMX0KC9whPpfq+SMOmYr8498nYViWM17fwsbQ XJqVit1NIZxFCkHbbCHkzDZ6g2z3Q6YElSCSgpL0z+dw0UPq834k2kRpKhSB8iw/4FvE oDFN70liK/LpN21P0rMib/vQ4g5h8qu/lM4+benKFtheve6Y1zaLgN9g72l/D+1/FXhp 9A1KPl0V7IGiDsL+RY8fRpgAPJSs1QdzftsvG5fEBCOcfkJjzlaYyw35N7bZR8yfY8OY ZkXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pAeU9q5CnpJfT++BG2kUPm+Vnm/VguQhkks1iYB8V1RnyV/GG a0+yMnf/zyMJjGs6t5g2UKg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzONjpO9SjuXRN+CP6Y92DVPyxEq2/TWj5uH6eCkT0PtAtAF2oBbvq8wznI938KC7UA3cablw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9795:: with SMTP id o21mr18086990pfp.26.1599445652375; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 19:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([167.88.61.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11sm10780986pjz.44.2020.09.06.19.27.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 06 Sep 2020 19:27:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Daryl Manning , Org-mode Subject: Re: Improving org-contacts performance (and state of development in general) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:26:31 +0800 Message-ID: <87imcqz5ig.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::529; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x529.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SnqsfofO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: hD6yEHvT9hoA > However, as the file and C-z notes have grown, > performance has really started to drag. I know people have used various > schemes (caching) etc to try to improve performance and the like, but > updates to the file are taking a solid 5 seconds now when making major > updates and moving tags around. Could you provide some examples what exactly is being slow? Maybe my WIP work on improving performance on large org files [1] might help. Best, Ihor [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg127740.html Daryl Manning writes: > Strangely, I've come to rely over the last year on org-contacts as a > lightweight, taggable CRM. However, as the file and C-z notes have grown, > performance has really started to drag. I know people have used various > schemes (caching) etc to try to improve performance and the like, but > updates to the file are taking a solid 5 seconds now when making major > updates and moving tags around. > > Is there a solid, forked branch anywhere that focuses on enhancing > performance anywhere? I'm tempted to wade in and add features and > improvements myself but my elisp-fu is dodgy at best (more golang these > days.). > > I'd be interested in what people are doing to speed it up (and if it is > under anything like active development for improvements. It does feel super > handy, and feels like it just needs a performance and more modern features > overhaul - more on interoperability and less on in-emacs interoperability.). > > Would love to hear what people have done overall workflow wise if they are > using it seriously. > > thanks, > Daryl.