Bruno Cardoso <cardoso.bc@gmail.com> writes:

>> We may also make %^{prompt}X expansions to work with %\N, but it can
>> break the existing templates that are tuned to the current behaviour.
>
> I see. Would it make sense to have another placeholder for '%^{prompt}X'?

See the attached tentative patch.

I introduced a new placeholder - %\*N. It refers to _all_ the prompts,
unlike %\N. If you have better ideas about syntax, please share.