From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Release 5.22 (Carsten Dominik Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:44:48 +0000 Message-ID: <87hcg3yhqn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <200802191705.m1JH5qll027622@bp34.u.washington.edu> <47BB19C0.2050508@u.washington.edu> <27254.1203446021@alphaville.zko.hp.com> <47BB2B3F.4070003@nabuli.de> <428F8D4B-88F4-4BE4-919C-1C000AB0BD66@science.uva.nl> <8763wjvqgp.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <20080220122505.5170601c@renner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnNj-0007VV-BM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:44:59 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnNh-0007T3-KB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:44:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnNh-0007Sr-Dc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:44:57 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRnNh-0006MB-A5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:44:57 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2025796fga.30 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:44:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080220122505.5170601c@renner> (Detlef Steuer's message of "Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:25:05 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Detlef Steuer Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Detlef Steuer writes: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:04:38 +0000 > Phil Jackson wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >> >>> +1 vote on that one. I haven't tried out 5.22 yet, but the >> >>> M-RET/M- behavior that Scott describes, also fits my >> >>> way of working perfectly. >> >> >> >> >> >> Arghh ... me too ... so count me in on this vote for wanting to having >> >> it back ... please ... :-) >> >> > I'll fix this for the next release, but I am traveling for the next >> > few days.... >> >> Any chance of making it configurable (default to the old behavior)? I >> like the new behaviour better, am I the only one? > > You're not alone! I do like the new behavior as well. One tiny problem, though: I wish the behavior of M-RET for list items and table cells would be in sync with the one for headlines. Or maybe the customizable variable would let the user to decide for each context. My 0.0002 ¤ :) -- Bastien