From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Another LaTeX export corner case... Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:32:43 -0800 Message-ID: <87hbeozplw.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37976 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQETn-0007d1-Ho for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:30:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PQETl-0002Rq-HM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:30:23 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PQETl-0002RM-AB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:30:21 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQETh-0002gr-Ml for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:30:17 +0100 Received: from c-67-164-33-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.164.33.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:30:17 +0100 Received: from richard.lawrence by c-67-164-33-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:30:17 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This evening, I noticed that the footnote syntax breaks if you use LaTeX commands with an optional argument inside a footnote, e.g.: * Some headline Blah blah blah blah[fn:: This enlightened message brought to you by \cite[p. 100]{SomeBibKey}] The internal square brackets in the \cite command cause the whole footnote to be escaped/exported literally (i.e., "[fn:: ..." appears in the text of the document). Is this a bug, or something that I must learn an Org incantation to work around? Thanks! Richard