From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Haselwarter Subject: Re: how to change the headline starter * Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:21:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87hb6netf6.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> References: <1240511841.2591431310664738370.JavaMail.root@zimbra29-e5.priv.proxad.net> <874o2optjt.fsf@praet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhfWG-0000Wy-CO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:21:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhfWF-00049s-BC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:21:16 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhfWF-00049o-4q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:21:15 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhfWA-0001yQ-Jq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0200 Received: from 90.66.113.78.rev.sfr.net ([78.113.66.90]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0200 Received: from philipp.haselwarter by 90.66.113.78.rev.sfr.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org No need to go all flaming because someone thinks the looks of the software matter. TBH I don't see what's wrong with that or in what way that's the opposite of efficiency. Abstracting the user interface from the logic is an important paradigm, especially for something like org-mode that you want to run on a wide range of devices – think 24" monitors vs 3" mobile devices. You don't want to have too much of the looks hardcoded. Now if you don't find that to be one of /your/ personal top priorities – fine, don't bother. But going all bashing because someone insists on his opinion that this is important? I don't see what you're trying to achieve here. -- Philipp Haselwarter