From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reiner Steib Subject: Re: Changing [X] by something else Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:40:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87hayxemir.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> References: <878vkdfemv.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Reply-To: Reiner Steib Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rw9T7-0001BH-CP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:42:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rw9T6-00049o-5r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:42:09 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rw9T5-00049e-Vq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:42:08 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rw9T4-0004um-8f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:42:06 +0100 Received: from p5dcb7fa1.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.203.127.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:42:06 +0100 Received: from Reiner.Steib by p5dcb7fa1.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:42:06 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wed, Feb 08 2012, François Pinard wrote: > I notice in org.el that [X] is hard-wired, while I would have liked the > possibility of changing it by [✓] in my things, which I find both softer > and cleaner. Could these ([ ], [-] and [X]) be turned into variables? > The difficulty might be to recognize them properly, I guess. > > While it would be nice that I could change it, it might also have a > negative effect, making Org files less interoperable between people. On > the other hand, the TODO keywords are already changeable, so there is a > kind of precedent :-). You probably could use display strings so the file on disk won't change at all. (info "(elisp)Display Property") (info "(elisp)Replacing Specs") Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/