From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Question on latex source block Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:09:03 -0600 Message-ID: <87har1hmts.fsf@gmx.com> References: <40C7B1BFC291ED4E9D10436D07736A3347089E653C@EXMAIL7.haas.uc.berkeley.edu> <8243.1347174432@alphaville> <87bohfywdt.fsf@gmx.com> <13524.1347212661@alphaville> <87ligj6l57.fsf@gmx.com> <87pq5q4g3x.fsf@gmail.com> <87392mnepg.fsf@gmx.com> <10651.1347552255@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCCul-0005oZ-5H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:09:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCCue-00057d-NB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:09:19 -0400 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:54907) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCCue-00057A-Fj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:09:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <10651.1347552255@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:04:15 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Abd=C3=B3?= Roig-Maranges , Org-mode , Jambunathan K >>=20 >> Perhaps you could use git-bisect to find the ID of the offending commit? >>=20 > > I did and I replied both to the list and cc: to you and Jambunathan (and > I added a clarification later). You probably haven't reached that point in > your email backlog yet, but if you don't see them let me know and I'll > forward them to you. > Oh, your' correct Nick, I do see this in my folder. Thanks for taking the time to do this Bisect. > Seems to be caused by 149cc04782651e74764eb3188f6a6f178fe25f64, which is > unfortunate since that fixes (at least I *think* it fixes) some problems > when no default fore/background is defined (e.g. when emacs is run in > batch mode). It would be nice if this could be fixed without reverting > that commit completely. I'm CC'ing Abd=C3=B3 (the author of that commit). Hopefully he can take a shot at solving this. --=20 Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte