From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Exporter interface question Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:45:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87hakrte9k.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> <8993D674-E5E6-4B8E-AE3C-75F694371459@gmail.com> <8738whsrx3.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip5cpwkx.fsf@gmail.com> <40E06D48-822F-4432-9D92-4F72AC866338@gmail.com> <87621cpqm5.fsf@gmail.com> <79ED4614-0209-4587-A8CE-343A7DBFAC3F@gmail.com> <871uc0p2kc.fsf@gmail.com> <2D69C12E-E2FF-4D1F-80AF-2676E68CE371@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCWe5-0004ce-63 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:45:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCWe4-0003Qf-3u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:45:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:40166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCWe3-0003QS-U1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:45:40 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so2097108wie.2 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 06:45:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2D69C12E-E2FF-4D1F-80AF-2676E68CE371@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:17:33 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org-mode List Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: >> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities? > > That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be > preferred to what I am doing right now? I didn't realize you had already modified the code. I think both methods are equivalent. Thank you again. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou