From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:21:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87hajnzagn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y5d6z46f.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTFn-000186-VW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:21:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTFm-0006HO-LJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:21:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:65288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTFm-0006HG-F7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:21:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so2025993wgg.12 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Alan Schmitt's message of "Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:04:49 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan Schmitt Cc: Dieter Wilhelm , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Dieter Wilhelm writes: > >> Dear list, >> >> I changed the html postamble >> >> org-html-postamble-format is a variable defined in `ox-html.el'. >> Its value is >> (("en" "

Author: %a (%e)

\n

Date: %d

\n

Generated by %c

\n") >> ("de" "

Autor: %a (%e)

\n

Datum: %d

\n

Generiert von %c

\n") >> ("fr" "

Auteur: %a (%e)

\n

Date: %d

\n

Generated by %c

\n")) >> >> Original value was >> (("en" "

Author: %a (%e)

\n

Date: %d

\n

Generated by %c

\n

%v

")) >> >> but now I can't specify a date in the form >> >> #+DATE: "%Y-%m-%d" >> >> Formerly an empty specification meant the current date, but now in the >> preamble the date remains empty. > > I'm having the same issue. Did you find a way around it? I didn't try to reproduce the problem, but specifying a format time string as a DATE value is not possible anymore. You still can provide a timestamp and tweak `org-export-date-timestamp-format' (or BIND it) to format it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou