From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Superscripts and subscripts
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:11:10 +0200
Message-ID: <87haj1kofl.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m14nf7bj0i.fsf@poto.westell.com> <87d2tv3s5b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87k3nynzzv.fsf@gmail.com> <877gjy9wvg.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<m1zjwu45da.fsf@poto.westell.com> <m2vc7h93ii.fsf@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55955)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UTdBr-0008PN-Vq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:11:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UTdBq-00048S-Tp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:11:15 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:54214)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UTdBq-00048K-M2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:11:14 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h11so2402427wiv.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2vc7h93ii.fsf@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:26:49 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Cc: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>

Hello,

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>>> Of course, we could work around this with a new rule saying "the longest
>>>> match wins", which, in this case, is the underline. But it would be
>>>> better to find a more elegant solution, one which would remove the sole
>>>> ambiguity, AFAICT, in Org syntax.
>
> How did this work before? I never tried subscript after whitespace. But
> we had both superscript-after-whitespace and
> underlining-with-underscores working at the same time, without the
> ambiguity causing problems as far as I remember.

Simple: underline text was always handled (i.e. protected for further
transformation) before subscript.

But this doesn't remove the ambiguity. It just adds another parameter:
the parsing order.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou