From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 07:11:51 -0600
Message-ID: <87hagejug8.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <444ea6cff489e2adc97092bdac881aef@mail.rickster.com>
	<878v1y574d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874ncm55ma.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<CALn3zohXL0x21gYhKj7QS0prJXDC_OcC4qgcejAqtk7b8-KytQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r4fq3ptf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip11h2zq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fvw5fkpt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3lgewrv.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bo6sqhir.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mwq7kv0r.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zogRv7VPkMgHY=y--CPb1WJvyGwoyZGSAuJgSqAksa9Y9w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52238)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Utdv3-0006H0-W9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:13:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Utdv2-0005qT-Cb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:13:25 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]:60582)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Utdv2-0005qA-4t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:13:24 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so2600297pdc.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 06:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zogRv7VPkMgHY=y--CPb1WJvyGwoyZGSAuJgSqAksa9Y9w@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Brand's message of "Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:23:14 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Eric
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've just pushed up a patch which implements this change.  Call lines
>> should now work exactly as named code blocks providing clarity,
>> uniformity and the flexibility to run multiple identical call lines.
>
> This is very useful for me sometimes, thank you.
>
> I am now adapting my recent ERT that you disabled in the meantime due
> to your changes and therefore have a question. With C-c C-c on this
> call line
>
>     #+NAME: src_block_location_shell sect call
>     #+CALL: src_block_location_shell()
>
> the result is
>
>     #+RESULTS: src_block_location_shell sect call
>     : shell a:1, b:0, c:3, d:0, e:0
>
> as expected. With org-test-with-expanded-babel-code I would expect the
> same but get
>
>     #+RESULTS:
>     : shell a:1, b:0, c:3, d:0, e:0
>
> Should the behavior of org-test-with-expanded-babel-code not be
> aligned?
>

Thanks for catching this.

The export function (used by `org-test-with-expanded-babel-code') hadn't
been updated to use call line names.  I've just pushed up a fix.

Best,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte