From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Standardize #+BIBLIOGRAPHY line Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:59:24 +0530 Message-ID: <87hafmpnh7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3kjyr37.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafn55l0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip02wx96.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbm67rq.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafmwuhs.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1JL3-0005lG-6g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1JKx-0004HV-Kx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:51:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]:46468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Ixn-0004Ac-Rs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:27:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kl13so1185773pab.34 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:27:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hafmwuhs.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:15:59 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > The system should exhibit some flexibility supporting e.g. notes, > parencite (prenote, key, year, postnote) and textcite key (prenote, > year, postnote). But there could be others. E.g. someone mentioned > using DOIs etc. I am not a scholar. I have never used Bibliographies before nor do I foresee that I would have a need for it. If someone is keen, it wouldn't be difficult to compile a common cases of "what" of citation specification. Atleast the minimal that the community itself has used in the past. I want to include year, page, some phrase => Output should look like this - both in cite Intext & Reference. How the syntax is specified and how it is implemented in Elisp should be left to others. For example, you can create a "bibliography.org" page in Worg (or may be in some other Wiki). You simply record the fact that wrapping of cite fragments is an issue. To make progress, all information should be collected in a manner that someone else can build upon.