From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Global TODO: display more than the TODO heading line? Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:15:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87ha9ju92g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87lhzd8dvk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871u15838n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87lhzcb6bu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzS1B-0000ya-FB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:16:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzS15-0003Lh-Mk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:16:01 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]:60387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzS15-0003LZ-Ey for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:15:55 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so14535291wes.32 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 06:15:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lhzcb6bu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:21:25 +0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> Maybe you can use `org-after-todo-state-change-hook' to store a note >> in a property, then display the content of this property in the column >> view -- but this is a bit hackish anyway. > > I've wanted this too -- if we're logging into a drawer (ie LOGBOOK), > shouldn't there be a relatively simple way of getting the drawer > contents, and taking the top (or bottom) log entry? > > On the other hand, looking at `org-add-log-setup', maybe it wouldn't be > all that easy, either. We could have a new special property like "LAST_NOTE" that would retrieve the last note, but I doubt the use-case is general enough to require such a new special property. The implementation would be 100% ad hoc... if many users need this, please speak up! -- Bastien