From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset Subject: Re: Texlive packages in Gnus via Org Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:23:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87ha9djt4t.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d2k1lbdq.fsf@gmail.com> <878uupv39x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87lhypjtd3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1DiJ-00017O-Su for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:23:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1DiI-0006KK-Jr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:23:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lhypjtd3.fsf@gmail.com> (Joseph Vidal-Rosset's message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:18:48 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: "Liste-emacs-orgmode@gnu.org " Le jeu. 09 janv. 2014 =C3=A0 12:18:48 , Joseph Vidal-Ross= et a envoy=C3=A9 ce message: > Le jeu. 09 janv. 2014 =C3=A0 11:49:14 , Bastien a envoy=C3= =A9 ce > message: >> Hi Joseph, >> >> Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >> >>> I wonder how it is possible to get png images in Gnus for everything >>> that is created by latex, as it is possible already to get it for >>> html >>> via org export. >> >> One indirect way is to run M-x org-preview-latex-fragment RET in a >> buffer containing the equations, then inlining^1 the .png files from >> the ltxpng/ directory. >> >> I can't think of something more direct right now. > > I try: > > \begin{e > > It seems that it will work for the equation package, but it does not > work with for example other packages: the prooftree command given by > bussproofs package does not work, Errata: read the index "m" in this formula as "c". It is a formula valid in classical logic of course, and not in minimal logic. But it was not the point of my email.=20 :) Jo.=20