From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] Org Minor Mode? Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:22:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ha4773dp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ha61f4rk.fsf@gmail.com> <8738hlkn64.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjj9g87k.fsf@gmail.com> <877g5znrgl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y4xnzif9.fsf@gmail.com> <8738ft379k.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uplim22.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4xl1mh5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zji0xysn.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4xks9a7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a99zlkbi.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwdzmplh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878upjpeoc.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhtj8j8t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y4xjnyis.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNhg-0000gC-SQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:22:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNhX-00013o-BN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:22:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]:64789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNhX-00013Q-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:22:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so2036510wgh.2 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:22:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y4xjnyis.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 16:15:23 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > So maybe I should stop insisting on an org-minor-mode, because outshine > and outorg together already do the trick? Indeed! (Do you have a screencast demonstrating this? It's all a bit abstract when put in words.) > I just thought it would be better, faster and more powerfull if Org's > regexps would be more abstract and Org functions could act directly in > the programming mode buffers. I'm surely getting old, but "better is the ennemy of good". If we already have something that fills the needs for org-minor-mode, then let's advertize this more and spare the work involved by making things faster... (do you really need to make outshine+outorg faster?) -- Bastien