From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Citations, continued
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:42:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87h9v6okq7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53294)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YHcyx-0001PX-Si
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:41:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YHcyu-00041m-Ne
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:41:23 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:40011)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YHcyu-00041e-Gu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:41:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> (Richard Lawrence's message of
	"Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:26:05 -0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> writes:

> As I mentioned in the earlier thread, I think the Pandoc syntax is a
> good place to start, and I think it would be valuable to have the two
> syntaxes be compatible.  But even Pandoc's citation syntax might not be
> general enough to satisfy everyone's needs, so the first step for
> introducing citation syntax to Org should be compiling a list of all the
> things such a syntax should represent.

See also 

  <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/72446>

BTW, I agree that a dedicated syntax is needed, but we failed to find
one so far.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou