From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch, ox-latex] better hyperref and title options Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:11:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9unl3pe.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87bnl0ynd2.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnkyvfz2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lhk0aqjd.fsf@pank.eu> <878ufzo3f2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mqn765j.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9unl4cp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMyz4-0001TM-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:11:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMyyz-0000kW-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:11:38 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMyyz-0000kQ-Cs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:11:33 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMyyy-0005W7-6S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:11:32 +0100 Received: from tsn109-201-154-163.dyn.nltelcom.net ([109.201.154.163]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:11:32 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn109-201-154-163.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:11:32 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Since KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION are really back-end dependant, I vote for > moving them from `org-export-options-alist' to back-end definitions. > Using `org-element-parse-secondary-string' will be required in this > case. OK. So are there any /other/ uses of DESCRIPTION but adding summaries to meta-data? > WDYT? Also, supposing you agree, do you want to do a patch (caveat: > there's "org.texi" messing involved)? Sure, I'll add it to my TODO. You'll suffer through the reviewing, so in either case the lion share of work will fall on you. Without much thought, these are the back-ends where it might make sense: ox-latex, ox-html, ox-texi, ox-odt, maybe ox-groff. In a second round, I might add a :with-keywords as well. When non-nil keywords are inserted at the location of keywords. Like #+TOC. So you'd have: #+begin_abstract Read my paper, pretty please. #+end_abstract #+keywords: topic1, ⋯, topicN → (If using ox-latex) \begin{abstract} read me \end{abstract} \keywords{topic1, ⋯, topicN} Where \keywords{·} is some function that I don't know yet. —Rasmus -- C is for Cookie