From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Clemente Subject: Re: Bug: HTML export ignoring CUSTOM_ID properties Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:15:18 +0700 Message-ID: <87h9s63e4p.wl-n142857@gmail.com> References: <87twwefwgz.fsf@jack.tftorrey.com> <871tjhwnd0.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2x62gam.wl-n142857@gmail.com> <877ft6aqp2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLfH-0002uq-LM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLfD-0002TV-Ix for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]:34612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlLfD-0002Sp-B5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:51 -0400 Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so25055963pdb.1 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:15:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877ft6aqp2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus , tftorrey@tftorrey.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou El Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:25:13 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure: > > Hello, > > Daniel Clemente writes: > > > I also saw this change (diff format): > > > > -
> > -
1.4.3.1.2 tercer error con stash
> > +
> > +
1.4.3.1.2 tercer error con stash
> > > > The #sec-1-4-3-1-2 format was better. If I delete section 1.4.3.1.2, > > section 1.5 is still called 1.5, that's good. > > And if you delete section 1.4, section 1.5 is no longer called 1.5. So > you need to update IDs most times you change headline numbering. I don't > think it is really better than the current state. > It's good to minimize the number of changes after each export. I prefer to review 10 changes rather than 200. I cannot just forget and let the automatic export work its way; I need to review it because in every export I find many different export bugs or unexpected features. While the two systems work, I don't see either why the #orgheadline129 system is better than the #sec-1-4-3-1-2. Not important enough to justify a breaking change either. > > And what's the use of IDs if they're not permanent? > > The point is that Org knows the ID associated to a given headline, and > provides tools to access them (`org-export-get-reference' for back-end > developers, [[*tercer error con stash]] for users). > IDs are not only internal. CSS knows about it, JS too, and URLs can be built and shared through the web that include org IDs (myweb.com/somedoc.html#someid).